Herman Well-Known Member Since Jan 29, 2010 Messages 2,748 Score 1 Tokens 0 Nov 1, 2010 • Nov 1, 2010 • 5 Replies 487 Views #1 In the past Durito posted that it was bad to play this. Was this due to a bad run or mathematically it is bad? Could you explain?
In the past Durito posted that it was bad to play this. Was this due to a bad run or mathematically it is bad? Could you explain?
choo Well-Known Member Since Sep 10, 2010 Messages 2,518 Score 0 Tokens 0 Nov 1, 2010 • Nov 1, 2010 • 5 Replies 487 Views #2 bump
MonkeyF0cker Mean People Suck Since Jan 27, 2010 Messages 11,529 Score 18 Tokens 0 Nov 1, 2010 • Nov 1, 2010 • 5 Replies 487 Views #3 Mathematically bad? Uhh... It's a question of efficiency not math. A smart person would build a database and find out for themselves.
Mathematically bad? Uhh... It's a question of efficiency not math. A smart person would build a database and find out for themselves.
choo Well-Known Member Since Sep 10, 2010 Messages 2,518 Score 0 Tokens 0 Nov 1, 2010 • Nov 1, 2010 • 5 Replies 487 Views #4 does anywhere outside don best have archived 2h pinny data?
rito Well-Known Member Since Jan 27, 2010 Messages 11,584 Score 1 Tokens 0 Nov 1, 2010 • Nov 1, 2010 • 5 Replies 487 Views #5 It's not efficient. The limits are small. Pinny won't even have half the games up till January. On that note, then though it shouldn't be terribly difficult to beat.
It's not efficient. The limits are small. Pinny won't even have half the games up till January. On that note, then though it shouldn't be terribly difficult to beat.
RayRay Dont touch my fucking TV Since Jan 27, 2010 Messages 10,906 Score 0 Tokens 0 Nov 1, 2010 • Nov 1, 2010 • 5 Replies 487 Views #6 i would be more interested in knowing how much squares move the 2nd half line with chase bets