Hooligans Plays Baccarat

Gauging interest in a Gamelive MLB season challenge

  • Start date •
  • Replies
    99 Replies •
  • Views 4,093 Views
Follow
Tron

Tron

Well-Known Member
Since
Jan 28, 2010
Messages
26,941
Score
2,952
Tokens
0
Anyone want to go heads up? Something really small like $250-$350. A friendly G-Live challenge.

Units with a min # of plays or something like that.

Opening Night is tommorow.

HOU a +145 home dog the last I looked.
 
I may be interested H2H for $250. Not interested in a shitload of rules as i don't a lot of time to quibble over small stuff in the summer. We can go 2-250 plays, sides, totals, RL, RRL. Lines posted at time, all games listed pitcher unless specified action.

Tell me what do you think. I'm not worried about a 3rd party holding money. If I have to worry about it, I'm not playing. You know where to find me too.
 
Daft
I think FW means between 200 and 250 plays

How about we use 5Dimes lines?

Or we just agree on a specific book that we use lines from?

I like the low stress angle.
Click to expand...

Sounds good and the low stress angle is better. 5 dimes works for me but if someone wants to use their book I don't have a problem as long as its verified. I quit these because I was sick of scammers and kids, I'm excited now.
 
The one thing I want the most Daft is is we get credited for the line at the time of post. Nothing is more lame than picking off stale numbers in a contest. If you get Toronto +120, muddy gets +110 and I play late at PK, those should be the lines we are credited for and not all +120 at open.
 
I agree with all that. I expect to be using SBRodds or something like that so any line I use should be verifiable with the time of the post. Not that you would have to worry about any monkey business with me, but I could possibly make an error.

As far as books, I will go along with anything. For reality purposes and the most dazzling results for me, it would be best to use matchbook but, like I say, I'll go along with anything.
 
Mudcat
I agree with all that. I expect to be using SBRodds or something like that so any line I use should be verifiable with the time of the post. Not that you would have to worry about any monkey business with me, but I could possibly make an error.

As far as books, I will go along with anything. For reality purposes and the most dazzling results for me, it would be best to use matchbook but, like I say, I'll go along with anything.
Click to expand...

As long as it can be verified, thats fine. I know i'm not going to check others lines.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.