Swinging Johnson
Well-Known Member
- Since
- Apr 3, 2010
- Messages
- 214
- Score
- 0
- Tokens
- 0
If you had 11 out of 12 winners, most people here would understand that it's a small sample size and over the long haul your numbers would at best be around 55% on -110 level wagers. That's assuming you are a fantastic handicapper, and you've already made clear your stance on assumptions.
The fact that you don't consider this to be even a slightly elevated forum is perhaps the cause of your troubles on this board. You are assuming there are just as many easily manipulated and naive people here as there are on SBR and the like, and that's just not accurate. You can call that an assumption or an assertion or whatever you wish. I don't really give a shit, which is also a fitting reflection of the interest we apparently have in your website.
Jello, you ignorant slut. You absolutely kill me! Even you find fault with 11 out of 12 winners! Oh my, that is priceless and you don't even bet. Gee, not to much skepticism here is there?! Talk about making my point. Look, let me concede that this a slightly elevated forum (as I don't want to spoil your delusions, er illusions), it really doesn't matter. Even if a guy is a 60% capper, it would make even more sense for him to consider all educated angles. Furthermore, if you go to my site great. if you don't and bitch about it, even better because I find it amusing as it reinforces all the stereotypes about jaded gamblers which are by and large, accurate! In any other business, people would just ignore a link posted by another poster. But not in gamblingville, no way no how. People get all worked up and it is priceless really. You don't even gamble for gawd sakes and you're taking a side. Love it.