Hooligans Plays Baccarat

Connecticut school shooting

  • Start date •
  • Replies
    453 Replies •
  • Views 21,687 Views
Follow
MrMonkey
I know in NJ there are 2 school superintendents for 1 city let alone a county! Lots of money wasted creating useless positions except for the people hired to do them! They won't go away but possibly each school district could have the parents vote on whether they want to be taxed more for school security? :dunno:
Click to expand...

This is what I want. Let the PTA of each individual school decide how much they are willing to spent on the security of their school. The parents will do anything to keep their kids safe. Like I said for me paying $50-$100 a month for school security is not a problem.
 
Cougar Bait
Some of the tweets...

Andrew Wilkow ‏So those are my only choices? You must love your car more than all the people killed on the roads this year.

Me: well are those my only choices? I already gave you other options. You didn't feel the need to retweet those.

Tami G.: CDC reports that 10 people a day die in water related injuries. What are we gonna do about about that, Seven?

Mike Stover: I just bought a box cutter even though a few men with one killed 3000 people on 9/11

Me: oooh the boxcutter argument. Yeah, because that's how 6 and 7 year olds are dying. You're a real genius.

46m BEAST: So why do you want to take Andrew's property away from him? AFAIK he and it has never hurt anyone. not urs2take

Me: It's simple. The one link in these tragedies is anti-depressants. Add that restriction to the 1968 gun law.

Me: I guarantee Andrew won't retweet that.


He didn't retweet anything after the first response. He has no answers. :lmao:
Click to expand...

I think you're failing to understand something. The guns weren't his in the first place. So how exactly does an anti-depressant restriction prevent this from happening?
 
Cougar Bait
Again...he was on meds...
Click to expand...
got no real answer(s) for that. personally, i think too many people are on meds, but i'm no doctor. and from what i understand, more "mental illnesses" are being added to the list to put people on medication for. heard a report the other day that internet addiction may now fall into that category, to be treated with medication instead of just taking their fcuking internet away. also, they're now adding grief to the list, and the definition to be considered a mental illness was someone still experiencing grief two weeks after a loss.
 
Saulty
Hire security like they have at the airports. Have security at the parking lots so only authorized vehicles are parked during school hours. Have security at the entrances. Have doors in the classroom that can be locked by security with a push of a button like the federal prisons. All these measures can be done without arming teachers with guns.
Click to expand...

Right. Turns schools into prisons. Ugh.
 
I'm going one step further - antidepressants need to be reevaluated, some of them probably need to be banned.

But that's obviously not going to happen. Pharmas are already struggling cause they can't come up with enough new patented drugs. Lobbyists are going to be murdered before dangerous antidepressants are going to be taken off the market.

Fokked up world boys.
 
Cougar Bait
Anyone on anti-depressants or in care of those on anti-depressants.
Click to expand...

So, you need to provide medical records of the people you live with in order to own a gun? What about friends of the person on anti-depressants? They might have access through them too. Are they next? And what happens when someone who already owns a gun has a child that is prescribed for anti-depressants? They have to forfeit them?
 
Matty
I'm going one step further - antidepressants need to be reevaluated, some of them probably need to be banned.

But that's obviously not going to happen. Pharmas are already struggling cause they can't come up with enough new patented drugs. Lobbyists are going to be murdered before dangerous antidepressants are going to be taken off the market.

Fokked up world boys.
Click to expand...

Agree with all of that.
 
Matty
I'm going one step further - antidepressants need to be reevaluated, some of them probably need to be banned.

But that's obviously not going to happen. Pharmas are already struggling cause they can't come up with enough new patented drugs. Lobbyists are going to be murdered before dangerous antidepressants are going to be taken off the market.

Fokked up world boys.
Click to expand...

Exactly. But some (here) are advocating not taking away the problem rather try to take away the result instead.
 
Matty
I'm going one step further - antidepressants need to be reevaluated, some of them probably need to be banned.

But that's obviously not going to happen. Pharmas are alreay struggling cause they can't come up with enough new patented drugs. Lobbyists are going to be murdered before dangerous antidepressants are going to be taken off the market.

Fokked up world boys.
Click to expand...

Part of the issue is that people are being given antidepressants at a high rate without a full evaluation. While medication should not be the first step or an immediate solution, antidepressants can be very effective in helping people that are struggling with depression. However, a person needs to undergo a comprehensive evaluation due to the nature of medication - if a person is given a medication that is not appropriate, it can have a very nasty effect on the person.

Speaking firsthand, I went to my annual "girl" exam and they asked if I needed antidepressants. Do I? Absolutely not. They are using that as a treatment for Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder, which I do not have. A woman's hormones are all over the place, and if they mention that they're cranky before their shark week, they're instantly given antidepressants or anti-anxiety medication. The doctor (nurse practitioner) was not a specialist. She should not have been prescribing that type of medication simply due to the fact that I said I feel like I'm out of control of my emotions a few days out of the month.

In other words, I don't believe that the medication itself is always bad. Can it be improved? Absolutely. My current issue with medication is the ease of access and the lack of responsible evaluation prior to prescribing.
 
MonkeyF0cker
So, you need to provide medical records of the people you live with in order to own a gun? What about friends of the person on anti-depressants? They might have access through them too. Are they next? And what happens when someone who already owns a gun has a child that is prescribed for anti-depressants? They have to forfeit them?
Click to expand...

Well if what I propose was in effect those 6 year olds wouldn't have had their faces blown off

I understand it's easy to do the "what if" but it is becoming a recurrant problem, thus my suggestion

I am simply saying they all seem to have a common variable

Seems like a good time to formulate a possible response

And a bad time to do nothing
 
Cougar Bait
Well if what I propose was in effect those 6 year olds wouldn't have had their faces blown off
Click to expand...

How do you know that? How do you know weapons cannot be procured elsewhere? In fact, I'd say that's pretty naive.

I understand it's easy to do the "what if" but it is becoming a recurrant problem, thus my suggestion

I am simply saying they all seem to have a common variable

Seems like a good time to formulate a possible response

And a bad time to do nothing
Click to expand...

It's a worse time to do the wrong thing.
 
MonkeyF0cker
How do you know that? How do you know weapons cannot be procured elsewhere? In fact, I'd say that's pretty naive.



It's a worse time to do the wrong thing.
Click to expand...

It's all based on assumptions, true. So what happens if nothing at all is done?

More kids will get murdered.

I mean, if that's your suggestion, I'd say that's ultimately irresponsible.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.