Hooligans Plays Baccarat

Matty, Durito and MonkeyFocker

  • Start date
  • Replies
    60 Replies •
  • Views 4,283 Views
Research the UN Arms treaty which ironically Obama offered support only hours after the election. They won't ban guns outright but piece by piece starting with ammunition.

Just google Arms Treaty and dual use ammunition, essentially there is a call to ban all dual use ammo (.308 and .223 caliber) as well as create an Internal gun registry database, all of this flys in the face of our own 2nd amendment.

They are going to price everything out of the market through tax policies unilaterally put in place through executive order.
 
And this is how you get around our own fucking constitution....

Amendment could be to ban all semi-automatics to various types of ammo


http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/CONF.217/CRP.1&Lang=E



Article 20
Amendments
1. At any time after the entry into force of this Treaty, a State Party may
propose an amendment to this Treaty.
2. Any proposed amendment shall be submitted in writing to the secretariat,
which shall then circulate the proposal to all States Parties, not less than 180 days
before the next meeting of the Conference of States Parties. The amendment shall be
considered at the next Conference of States Parties if a majority of States Parties
notify the secretariat that they support further consideration of the proposal, no later
than 120 days after its circulation by the secretariat.
 
3. Any amendment to this Treaty shall be adopted by consensus of those
States Parties present at the Conference of States Parties. The depositary shall
communicate any adopted amendment to all States Parties.
4. A proposed amendment adopted in accordance with paragraph 3 of this
article shall enter into force for all States Parties to the Treaty, upon deposit with the
depositary of the instruments of acceptance by a majority of States Parties at the
time of the adoption of the amendment. Thereafter, it shall enter into force for any
remaining State Party on the date of deposit of its instrument of acceptance.
 
Independent Federal Reserve :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:

Durito you're a hoot

Yeah Bernake that engineered QE1 QE2 and QE3 and is Obama's lapdog and Goldman Sach's bitch is totally independent

It's not a coincidence that people all over the nation (including those on the left and right) are asking for the fed to be audited, the vast majority are educated in history and are people who understand you can't keep propping the economy up indefinitely. They don't just assume that those in power are all "doing the right thing."

The Republicans refused to pass one of Obama's budgets which would have reduced spending. Instead, spending remains at Bush levels. How is he responsible for that?

Do you honestly think Obama wants to be in this situation? Or that he believes that quantitative easing is the solution?
 
Independent Federal Reserve :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:

Durito you're a hoot

Yeah Bernake that engineered QE1 QE2 and QE3 and is Obama's lapdog and Goldman Sach's bitch is totally independent

It's not a coincidence that people all over the nation (including those on the left and right) are asking for the fed to be audited, the vast majority are educated in history and are people who understand you can't keep propping the economy up indefinitely. They don't just assume that those in power are all "doing the right thing."

I don't know anyone that understands monetary economics that thinks this way. I've been hearing the right scream hysterically about inflation for 4 years, haven't seen it yet.

Let me know how you think fed policy would differ under a Republican president.
 
I don't know anyone that understands monetary economics that thinks this way. I've been hearing the right scream hysterically about inflation for 4 years, haven't seen it yet.

Let me know how you think fed policy would differ under a Republican president.

Well it wouldn't be Bernanke. However if you mean would the Republicans bite the bullet and actually account for gas and food prices that aren't currently being factored in? Hard to know.
 
Well it wouldn't be Bernanke. However if you mean would the Republicans bite the bullet and actually account for gas and food prices that aren't currently being factored in? Hard to know.

How do you know it wouldn't be Bernanke? FYI, he was initially appointed under Bush.

The CPI has never used gas or food prices due to their volatility. It has ALWAYS been that way.