Hooligans Plays Baccarat

Blitty, we have a fok'n problem.

  • Start date •
  • Replies
    129 Replies •
  • Views 4,491 Views
Follow
wal66

wal66

Well-Known Member
Since
Feb 1, 2010
Messages
11,716
Score
2
Tokens
0
There is an add/drop feature on our fantasy site. This feature enables the user to drop a player they wont be using for whatever reason it happens to be and to add any player that is available. I understand that collusion can and does happen with trades and in the best interest of the league sometimes trades must be reviewed. FOKn ADD/DROP however should not.

If I make a move that eventually hurts my team then thats my fault. You dont know what I THINK might be MY needs for a particular week. I have players who are injured and may or may not play and I have to make assumptions in order to field a team on gameday.

Stay the fok out of my ADD/DROP maneuvers.
 
No Wal, Blitty is absolutely right. You're dropping players that have major fantasy value, which are then scooped up by whoever is quickest to react. If we had waivers this wouldn't be as big an issue - it would still be retarded, but at least everyone else would have a chance at picking up your golden scraps - but you being a bit of a moron combined to the lack of waivers = clusterfuck.

Stop dropping top-tier guys cause they caught a cold. Bench/trade them so you don't release a lot of value back into the FA pool. You fucking maroon.
 
Matty
It's Tuesday.
Click to expand...

and the RB he wanted, might not have been there on Tues Night. RB's are at a premium already this year.

I'd lean towards changing to a waiver wire, before we start censoring people that paid 50 life changing dollars to play.

No reason to edit people's team over a few hundred bucks, agreed!
 
Matty, Spiller is out this week, Forte is a maybe. Spiller going to the bench because he is valuable enough to hold on to when he's back but Forte is a loss I have to take just to put a body in the lineup this coming week.

I have reciever needs as well since my only real reciever is a probable no-show this week with a still injured foot.

What I do is not trades I simply add/drop to stay out of the slightest hint of colluding. I play week to week and if someone is quick enough to scoop up a player of value then good for them. I ask you though, what value is there in a player who has a good chance of not playing?
 
Create a Master List of Rules for Reference

To avoid any problems in your fantasy football league its smart to create a master list of rules. If the league makes any changes, simply update the list. If anyone has any problems, e-mail them the list. Avoiding arguments by simply having all the rules laid out can save a fantasy football commissioner hours of long, heated discussions.
 
Matty
Of course man, I woulda dropped Peyton Hillis and picked him up. Zero hesitation.
Click to expand...

I'm glad you answered honestly.

This is exactly why I use add/drop instead of trades options. Trading would involve choosing between owners, it would also involve choosing who available is the best offer. I don't want to have to choose between owners and more importantly I don't want to expose myself to openly making a bad choice.

I like add/drop for game-by-game decisions and specific matchups.


You can make the "wally rule" but I want to see a "Fok'n Asshole Blitty" rule as well. That rule would be to make all rules prior to play and no more of this on-the-fly-as-it-suits-my-mood crap.
 
Wally with all due respect Forte is a consensus top 10 (top 5 in most) pick before the injury and he isn't going to miss much time at all. Albeit you recently kicked my ass and I could go all defeated but


Fyi Archie you're not fooling anyone you dropped Jackson because he got completely focked up and Spiller went all world on the League and looked to be their new feature back (60/40 over Jackson at worst before he got his collar bone crushed) and now Jackson comes back

Just kidding Wally keep doing what you're doing :cheers:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.