Search results

:cougarbait: didn't realize you were allergic to the truth. so what part of the video did you take issue with?

lol, you are? but you don't even know what a neocon is. :clueless: so let me get this straight, you call me a neocon parrot, and now you're waiting for me to prove that I'm NOT a neocon parrot. ...by finding a post "in opposition of the Neocon agenda"! :lmao: ok, how about my last one...

Warning: Propaganda Video! .

how can one judge score a fight 30-27 and another score the same fight 28-29??? and fuck, I didn't even realize until just now that the varner bet had pushed. I watched the fight last night and after the last round, it went to commercial and i just turned the station not even thinking...

I see the problem now. You have no clue what a "neocon" is. That "propaganda website" was probably one of the first, if not the first to use the term neocon. I shouldn't be surprised though, you think drinking progressive kool-aid and voting for George Bush 10 years ago makes you an...

oh, so criticizing Obama is parroting neocons? gtk :yawn: search for Obama posts lol

since when? I guess you're talking about the rule of Obama again.

No I'm telling you what you are not. How about you point out all those posts I made "parroting" neocons. Again, you can't. You're really losing creditability here. And like I said before I don't pay attention to the Rs and Ds, but you obviously do, Mr. Independent.

It's about legal procedure jackass. It's about the lack of due process. How about you give me the legal standing where the President has the authority to this? YOU CAN'T. it doesn't exist. Because it's the rule of Obama, not the rule of law.

lol almost forgot this post. you're delusional if you think you're independent. you get offended when I criticize Obama and solicit "but Bush and Republicans did it" arguments over and over.

really? where?

keep leaning on that strawman, it's all you got.

yeah, that "idiot" rule of law side. :theshrink: Tuesday night on TV: “Tomorrow, I will meet with the chairman of BP and inform him that he is to set aside whatever resources are required to compensate the workers and business owners who have been harmed as a result of his company’s...

I completely agree. However some us think the government can be relied upon this time. They just need to seize some of BP's money first.

maybe you need to wake up. nearly all mainstream news is propaganda.

I apologize for suggesting you were lying, you really do fail at reading comprehension. so now that Obama has subverted the law by going on tv and saying that he is going to inform :bat: the BP CEO that he is to set up an escrow account for the government to process payouts from, it's...

lol

States Need To Launch Criminal Investigation Into BP, Federal Governments Role In Oil Spill ^^ good read.

where is this profile of liberals that I describe? yeah spirit of this thread :jerk: a thread that's titled "It is a bizarre spectacle watching neocons defending all things BP ". Yeah, that seems completely non-partisan to me. So I can't criticize the unlawful tactics of the Obama...

so now it's PART of the settlement. :propeller: according to who again??? hmm, did i infer that? now either you are purposely lying or you fail at reading comprehension. Did Republicans initiate the bailouts? I would call bullshit here but I honestly don't know. I don't really care if...